Skip to Content
Wednesday 21 September 2016
The venue will be open from 2pm – 3pm on Wednesday, 21 September for anyone who would like to practise or just get a feel for the room. There will be someone from Massey University at the venue to assist anyone with details, questions or queries.
All finalists are expected to be present at the full briefing at 4.30pm in the Theatre.
The running order of contestants will be drawn at random, and will be done on Monday, 19 September ahead of the competition – all finalists will receive the running order before 5pm Tuesday 20 September.
At the beginning of the event, the MC for the evening, Te Radar, will introduce each candidate, the presentation title and the university that they are representing.
The candidates slide will then be transitioned onto the screen and the candidate will then be welcomed to the centre of the stage. Lapel microphones with battery packs will be attached, so this should be considered when selecting clothes.
The timer will start once the candidate begins, an electronic timer system will be on countdown where the candidates can easily view.
At the end of presenting, the lapel microphones will be removed for another candidate that has yet to present.
Following the final master's presentation a 10 min judging deliberation will occur. During this time the Peoples Choice voting will be open via an online app – details will be available at the event and to those watching via Live stream.
Subsequent to the deliberation the winners will be announced and presented with their prizes.
At the conclusion of the prize giving those competing in the Inter-University Masters competition are free to stay on and watch the Massey University PhD competition finals.
Each presentation will be streamed live and recorded and individual recordings will be made available at a later date through Massey University's YouTube channel.
Did the presentation provide an understanding of the background to the research question being addressed and its significance?
Did the presentation clearly describe the key results of the research including conclusions and outcomes?
Did the presentation follow a clear and logical sequence?
Was the thesis topic, key results and research significance and outcomes communicated in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience?
Did the speaker avoid scientific jargon, explain terminology and provide adequate background information to illustrate points?
Did the presenter spend adequate time on each element of their presentation - or did they elaborate for too long on one aspect or was the presentation rushed?
Did the oration make the audience want to know more?
Was the presenter careful not to trivialise or generalise their research?
Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their research?
Did the presenter capture and maintain their audience's attention?
Did the speaker have sufficient stage presence, eye contact and vocal range; maintain a steady pace, and have a confident stance?
Did the PowerPoint slide enhance the presentation - was it clear, legible, and concise?
The judges will not provide feedback on the night but will be collected and can be requested after the event by contacting Marise Murrie.
First place: $1000
People's Choice: $250
Page authorised by Manager, Events
Last updated on Tuesday 16 August 2016