Policies based on need?
We appear to have a new principle emerging in
New Zealand politics, at least in contrast to what has dominated
for some time and has been termed "political correctness".
It has arisen as a direct response to a marked shift in the polls
following a speech by Don Brash, leader of
the opposition National Party on 27 January 2004.
The new principle is that policies should
be based on need, not membership of a particular group.
In the cabinet reshuffle of 24 February 2004,
following the departure of Leanne Dalziel, Ruth Dyson became
Associate Minister of Labour, "handling policy issues
such as work-life balance and family-friendly workplaces"
(as reported in the Manawatu Evening Standard, 25 February 2004,
p.7).
Ruth Dyson is also Minister of Women's Affairs.
A speech of hers dated 21 February 2004 can be
found at: http://www.beehive.govt.nz/ViewDocument.cfm?DocumentID=19016
In it she mentions that "we" (i.e.
the government) are launching an Action Plan for Women on 8 March
2004.
She also mentions:
- "the whole of government
approach called reducing inequalities to
reduce the inequities between Maori women and other women
in New Zealand" (but not men)
- "the passing of the Prostitution
Reform legislation aimed at safeguarding the human
rights of women in prostitution and protecting them from
exploitation" (The NZ Herald of 28 June 2003
reported that over half the people arrested for
soliciting in the past five years were men.)
- "Actions that benefit New Zealand
women are to the advantage of us all not to the
detriment of men!" (echoes of the now rejected
view in the Family Court that what is good for the mother
is in the best interest of the child - "Judge
Inglis rejected any idea that weight should be placed on
the mothers emotional and psychological wellbeing,
"leading to the assumption that the happiness of the
relocating parent will meet the best interests of the
childs welfare." That argument was rejected in
"D v S" as "inconsistent with the wider
all-factor child-centre approach required under New
Zealand law."" http://www.courts.govt.nz/family/columns/column19.html)
- "women in the paid labour force
has risen over the past years, but ... challenges to this
include the persistence of a gender pay gap, occupational
segregation and the increasing difficulty of achieving
work-life balance." (is work-life balance not a
problem for men?)
- "Work-life balance
We need to tackle womens family/whanau
responsibilities.
We have worked hard in this country for womens
participation, particularly in the paid labour market and
there have been great improvements in that area. What we
havent done yet is get the right balance between
paid and unpaid work." (is work-life balance
not a problem for men?)
- "Work-life balance is not just an
issue for women. Overall, a decade of a deregulated and
competitive environment has reduced the quality of life
for many workers of both genders. A lot of men have more
stress in their lives than is healthy.
But women have paid the greater price because of the
additional level of stress that accompanies our role as
carers." (so men's fulfillment of caring
responsibilities can continue to be ignored and/or
obstructed?)
- "the sorts of things women need
to function effectively in the paid workforce like
family-friendly policies and flexible working hours
are simply an essential part of managing a companys
most valuable resource people" (so is
family-friendly a people issue or a women's issue?)
- The Women's Action Plan "will
give us a whole of government approach to
womens issues, with a clear, commonsense framework
for action." (so the approach is based on group
membership, rather than need)
- One of the Plan's three main themes is "balancing
our work, family, whanau and community roles" (again,
the focus in the Plan is on these issues specifically in
relation to women)
- On research into Pacific women, "I
can assure you that Pacific women are involved at all
stages of the research, both as researchers and on the
project steering group." (but gender analysis,
as described by the Ministry of Women's Affairs, does not
even require consultation with men - see: http://econ.massey.ac.nz/cppe/papers/gpse.htm)
Stuart Birks
26 February 2004
Back to Stuart Birks' Gender Page,
or Stuart Birks' Home Page, or Search Stuart's gender pages